I love the design of the new CandyBar site, and after exploring the CSS I saw a Helvetica face I hadn’t thought to use on the web before.
It’s called “Helvetica Neue Light”, and while the CandyBar site is referencing a slightly different name (HelveticaNeue-Light) (see update below) it is a Mac system font that all Mac users should theoretically have, if declared in CSS as “Helvetica Neue Light”. And it’s quite pretty.
Even better, after discovering this I naturally ventured into Font Book and discovered more gold in the form of “Helvetica Neue UltraLight” which can also be declared in CSS as such. It’s a real beauty, perfect for headings, and with my new found appreciation for Helvetica, these are very nice finds. Here’s some samples:
I’m 24px Helvetica Neue Light, and I look fantastic.
I’m 24px Helvetica Neue Ultra Light. Some might say my kerning’s a little tight…
I’m Helvetica Neue Ultra Light with 1px of letter-spacing. Though I still look a little lost here, maybe I should be reversed out?
Ah, here we go. Lovely.
Of course, Windows users are unfortunately left out of this particular party, and there’s no Windows system font equivalent for these lighter faces. In their case, we can sIFR the headings and default to Arial for body copy.
Update: For some reason, Safari was displaying the above examples as plain old Helvetica Neue. So I tried the Panic way of declaring Helvetica Neue Light, and it worked, which is odd. So, when declaring both spellings (font-family: “Helvetica Neue Light”, “HelveticaNeue-Light”, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif) they render correctly in Firefox, Safari, and Opera. So that’s why Panic spelled it that way.
Update (July 9, 2008): The above samples should now mostly work in Firefox 3, and still work great in Safari. For some reason specifying a font-weight of 100 for Ultra Light still renders as Light in Firefox 3, even though that is the lightest possible value. I can’t seem to find any samples of this actually working in Firefox 3, possibly it’s a browser bug? If anyone out there in the blogosphere knows how to get this working please let me know in the comments. Thanks.
10 Responses to “Helvetica Neue variants for use on the web”
May 17th, 2008
You website looks awesome. Well done! I use “Helvetica Neue” a lot when designing new websites, but wonder if it’s installed on Windows machines as well?
May 17th, 2008
Wow, thanks! You’ve got a pretty awesome-looking site yourself :)
Yeah, unfortunately Windows users don’t get Helvetica Neue by default, so the best we can do is specify the closest Windows font, Arial, after Helvetica Neue in the font-family declaration.
Jun 12th, 2008
I just noticed that in Firefox v3 this does not work. FF2 is working fine but Mac OS X 10.5.3 FFv3 rc3 is unhappy.
Jun 12th, 2008
Yep, you’re right Johnny, I just upgraded to FF3 and these samples just look like Helvetica Neue. Guillermo Esteves has the explanation right here: http://gesteves.com/post/36097597/helvetica-neue-light
Jun 13th, 2008
Terrific! I feel like I should have known this too but your post is most helpful.
Oct 24th, 2008
Possibly the worst choice of font for body copy ever!!!!!!
As stated above it doesn’t render at all well for pcs.. in ie7 and firefox it’s barely legible! especially considering firefox deals with pixels fonts.
For pc users who do have Helvetica Neue Light, your once pretty website designs look completly crap!
Sorry if ive spoilt your party.
(p.s by all means use it in titles)
Oct 24th, 2008
Oh, I totally agree Richard, they’re not the most legible fonts for body copy :)
Aug 10th, 2009
only short message: Thanks and GREETING FROM GERMANY
Aug 23rd, 2009
I just noticed that with chrome this does not work. thanks and have a nice day
Aug 23rd, 2009
I like the new variants but a lot of browsers ignore them :-(